• Blockletter
  • Posts
  • Crypto on the Campaign Trail: Will Harris and Walz Court the Digital Vote?

Crypto on the Campaign Trail: Will Harris and Walz Court the Digital Vote?

As the 2024 election heats up, the Harris-Walz campaign faces growing pressure to clarify its stance on cryptocurrency. Will they embrace the future of finance or leave voters in the dark?

As the U.S. election in November approaches, Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign is drawing attention from the crypto community. With polls showing Harris neck and neck with Donald Trump in battleground states, many in the crypto industry are hoping the Democratic ticket will support a favorable stance on digital assets. As the clock ticks down to election day, Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, have yet to articulate a clear crypto policy, leaving industry insiders eager for clarity.

The Silence on Economic Issues

Since launching her presidential campaign on July 21, Harris has been notably quiet on economic matters, including those affecting the crypto sector. This silence has led to speculation about her potential stance on digital assets, especially given her opponent's emerging interest in the topic.

Trump's campaign has indicated that major rallies will be postponed until after the Democratic National Convention, leaving the crypto community in suspense about where Harris stands.

Industry Voices and Crypto Advocacy

Within the Democratic camp, there's a growing push to ensure that the party doesn't cede the crypto issue to Trump. North Carolina Representative Wiley Nickel, entrepreneur Mark Cuban, and others are slated to speak at a virtual town hall organized by "Crypto Advocates for Harris." This group aims to encourage Harris to develop a clear crypto policy platform that can resonate with voters in the industry.

Despite her campaign's early stage, Harris finds herself in a statistical tie with Trump in key battleground states. The crypto community is closely monitoring this race, with market prediction platforms like Polymarket marking it as a "tossup." Some industry leaders, like Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have expressed cautious optimism that the next administration, regardless of party, will adopt a constructive approach to crypto.

Lawmakers' Warnings and Harris's Opportunity

Harris's absence from the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville, just days after her campaign launch, has not gone unnoticed. Prominent Democrats, including Representative Nickel and California Representative Ro Khanna, have warned against making crypto a partisan issue this election cycle. Trump, on the other hand, has tried to position Harris as "against crypto," linking her to the Biden administration's policies.

In a July letter to Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison, House lawmakers urged the party to adopt a forward-looking approach to digital assets and blockchain technology. They argued that Harris could help shift the public perception that Democrats are hostile to crypto, providing a fresh perspective on regulation within the party.

The Need for a Clear Crypto Stance

As of now, Harris and Walz have not indicated whether they plan to introduce a crypto policy platform before November. Some, like former Biden adviser Moe Vela, have called on Harris to publicly clarify her position on cryptocurrency. Vela emphasized the need for a comprehensive crypto platform, suggesting that Democrats must have a "crypto awakening" to recognize the potential benefits of digital assets in achieving their policy goals.

The Harris-Walz campaign's position on crypto remains a significant question mark as the election draws nearer. While Democratic leaders and industry advocates push for clarity, the campaign has yet to make any concrete commitments. As Harris prepares to face Trump in upcoming debates, the crypto community will be watching closely, eager to see if the Democratic ticket will embrace or distance itself from digital assets. The outcome of this race could have profound implications for the future of crypto policy in the United States.